Creating an Effective AWS Cost Allocation Strategy

Moving to the cloud has become a big part of business strategy for many organizations. As the pace of cloud adoption increases, keeping track of cloud costs has become a top concern for leaders and financial teams. This is where FinOps, or cloud financial management, comes into play. At the heart of FinOps is the idea that teams should be aware of what they’re spending and make smart decisions about their cloud usage. One way to make this happen is by putting a strong cost allocation strategy in place.

So, why is cost allocation such a big deal?

When done right, it helps a company understand exactly where their cloud money is going. It allows teams to see how much they’re spending, which projects are burning through their budgets, and whether departments are staying within their financial limits. This visibility pushes better budget management and forces teams to think twice before racking up costs.

Traditional IT methods for managing costs don’t translate well to the cloud. In the past, fixed budgets and clear-cut cost centers with fairly static cost structures were the norm. But in the cloud, resources can be used in a much more flexible way—services might run for an hour, a week, or scale up and down as needed. Without a modern approach to cost allocation, it’s easy for organizations to lose sight of what’s being spent and why. This can lead budgets being blown and under-utilised or poorly managed cloud resources.

In this post, we’ll look at how to build a practical AWS cost allocation strategy that goes beyond outdated methods. You’ll learn about the key ideas, practical steps, and smart strategies that can help teams keep their cloud spending in check.

The Challenges with Traditional IT Accounting in the Cloud Era

Companies migrating their on-premise IT infrastructure to the cloud tend to bring old habits of cost tracking with them. It may have seemed a good fit at the time, but it won’t take long to find out these methods simply will not cut it in the cloud.

Traditionally, IT cost management has been about “knowing what you’ll spend.” IT organizations budget for hardware purchases, perpetual licenses of software, and periodic maintenance. These are then allocated by the simple division among the number of users or departments. That works just fine when things don’t change much, where the environments are easy to understand.

Cloud services are a little different. The cloud allows teams to scale up their resources at any time. That’s great for flexibility and can even help save some cash, but it also makes tracking of spending way more complicated. It might seem minor-a server running only for a day, a system ramping up to keep up with a traffic spike-but when those uses add up across projects and departments, the costs can rack up awfully fast.

In such an environment, the application of old methodologies for cost allocation leads to confusion and biased budgets.

Take a finance team that wants to divide cloud costs based on basic user counts or by department splits; the numbers will just not match actual usage. That means some teams pay for what they never use, while others are not seeing the costs they actually created. The bottom line: nobody takes ownership, and opportunities start slipping by for controlling spending. We need a solid way to break down cloud costs so that each team knows exactly what they’re spending. This helps everyone get a grip on where their money is going and makes them think twice about how they use cloud resources. Shifting to a cloud-focused strategy makes it way clearer than a budget that could get pretty confusing otherwise.

Key Components of an AWS Cost Allocation Strategy

The best way to create a good AWS cost allocation strategy is to start with the very basics. This would be knowing how to organize accounts, to use tags effectively, and to map your company’s structure on AWS tools.

Nailing the Basics: Accounts and Tags

One of the first things most people do is set up their AWS account structure. Most companies have to make the typical choice between a single account or multiple accounts to meet business needs. It’s going to be much easier to separate the costs by department, project, or environment in a multi-account strategy, assigning responsibility for overspending much more easily. If you go this route, using AWS Organizations will help you manage those accounts in one place.

**Tags are another key part of this strategy: ** A tag in AWS is just a label that you attach to an AWS resource, such as “Project: MarketingApp” or “Department: Finance.” That way, you are able to do some working out of costs and the parts of the business burning cash. Tags are only useful if they’re applied correctly, which is why there should be some sort of clear rules on what the mandatory tags should be named.

Matching Costs to What the Business Needs

When it comes to choosing your cost allocation strategy, it is not just tagging and creating some accounts; it’s actually making those tools work in the way your business actually runs. If the firm is project-oriented, then the tagging should clearly state that, so it would be easy to track the cost of each project. Similarly, if the budget is departmentalised, tagging should enable one to view the costs of each department. AWS Cost Categories can really help out. This feature lets you group related costs, so even if a project spreads across different accounts or uses a bunch of services, you can still get the whole cost picture. Creating cost categories that make sense for your company makes keeping track of spending much easier.

Creating a Chargeback and Showback Model That Works

Once you’ve created your accounts and tagged them appropriately, the next order of business is how you plan on tracking that cloud spending and showing it off. This is where chargeback and showback models come in. Both of those will let you know who’s using what, but each takes a subtly different approach in making teams responsible.

Chargeback and showback explained

The chargeback model involves your charging each team or department based on actual usage of cloud resources. Spending becomes very transparent to the teams, as it hits their budget directly. If a department pays for what it uses, it’s more likely to pay closer attention to how much it uses, seeking ways of keeping it as low as possible.

The Showback model does not involve charges being billed directly to the various departments. In other words, it will show the teams how much cloud usages amount to without necessarily transferring the cost to the team’s budget. This model proves to be very effective in raising awareness and making teams aware of their usage. Many times, this system is used as a stepping stone toward a full chargeback model in order to let the teams get used to the tracking of expenses over some time.

Finding the Right Fit

Which to choose, chargeback or showback, depends on where the company is in its journey. If the teams are just getting familiar with managing their cloud costs, showback will be a rather gentle way to build awareness. Let teams first get used to what their usage patterns are and start brainstorming ways to cut costs before real charges come into play.

If they can handle a little more responsibility, then chargeback is probably the way to go. That really makes them take ownership in their spending, as it comes out of their budget.

Addressing Shared Costs

Whichever model is adopted, there are shared costs, such as Enterprise Support, Marketplace purchases, Data transfer costes amongst others. These are expenses that are quite difficult to attribute to any one business unit. You can deal with these in one of two ways: You can either split them by usage-a certain percentage of the cost to a team using the shared resource-or divide the cost across the number of teams using it. Which is right will be about how your company works and what is fair for your teams. Setting some clear rules on how to deal with shared costs keeps everyone in the know, and the teams will surely appreciate knowing what to expect when those shared expenses pop up in their cost reports.

Implementation of AWS Tools for Cost Allocation

Now that we have either the chargeback or showback model decided upon, it would be apt to implement the required AWS tools that will get things seamless. AWS has a number of features available to let you track your cloud expenditure and make cost allocation easier.

Getting the Most Out of AWS Organizations

AWS Organizations becomes really critical when you have a lot of accounts to manage. It lets you bundle them under one management system and hence makes it way easier to keep track of actual money usage by different teams or projects. You can configure Organizational Units (OUs) to group accounts according to similar cost centers or budgets, such as dev, testing, and production accounts. In this way, you can trace the entire company’s spending and at the same time have detailed reports for each group. Using AWS Cost Explorer

AWS Cost Explorer is that cool little tool that lets you see how much you are spending. You can further tune it to show the costs by account, service, or tag, making visualization way easier to see where your money is going. It’s useful if you want to compare what you’re spending to the budgets or check the trend in the cost shift over time. Setting up dashboards using saved reports for different teams is extremely helpful because it lets them track how they’re using things and make smart decisions.

AWS Cost and Usage Reports (CUR) are pretty useful if you want to get really detailed with your cloud spend. CUR shows line-item detail of all costs associated with your use of AWS services. These make deep reporting required for chargeback or showback models super easy, and it helps to keep an eye on your spending in an extremely detailed manner. It’s the kind of information which helps the teams understand what they were using and where they can save a few bucks. Cost Classes

AWS Cost Categories are perfect in helping you categorize your costs into groups that suit your business needs. If the project requires engagement between multiple teams and accounts, the Cost Category would summarize those costs in one pile. Generally speaking, it helps finance teams track the total spend on either a particular project or a department without needing to dig deep into the millions of individual cost items.

Using Other Tools:

There are other tools that are well worth mentioning which will help improve your cost allocation implementation:

• AWS Budgets: Helps set spending limits and alerts for different teams. This keeps everyone aware when spending starts to approach budget limits.
• AWS Billing Conductor: is quite helpful in configuring and presenting cost organization. Great if you have complex chargeback models that cannot quite fit the out-of-the-box billing configuration, or if you are a Managed Service Provider with multiple customer accounts within you AWS Organisation. I worked with one State Goverenment Department that had multiple Agencies under its umbrella, each with its own budget. We ended up deploying Billing conductor groups; one for each Agency so that we were able to not only purchase Savings Plans dedecated to the agency, but also to be able to attribute shared costs back to the individual agences using custom pricing plans.
• CUDOS Dashboards: Provides clear, visually dashboards that make it easier to track and understand your cloud spending. Another customer I worked with diligently used cost centre WBS codes to tag the vast majority of the AWS resources they deployed. As a result, we ended up having to modify the default CUDOS dashbards to use these Cost Centre tags rather than Accounts to visualise spend across their AWS accounts.

Combined, these tools establish a really strong base for cloud cost monitoring and reporting in terms relevant to your business.

Overcoming the Non-Technical Hurdles

It is not all about having all the tools up and running for AWS cost allocation; it also needs a set of non-technical concerns that must be addressed-sometimes these make or break how well a cost strategy will fit within an organization. In a previous post I talked about the importance of building a FinOps Culture through training and education. This is key in tackling some of these non-technical barriers to implementing a cost allocation strategy.

Building support across departments

Finance, engineering, and operations must involve the leadership teams in order for a cost allocation strategy to pay off. Of course, ensuring that all departments have versions of budgeting and spending may be trying when some of them are going to be apprehensive about a chargeback model that holds them directly responsible for costs, while others see no need for detailed cost tracking.

It’s often good to begin by showing how this will help out all parties. Engineering teams might love having strong cost data to better explain where their budget went or to illustrate what value they may bring in. And finance teams usually just love getting that extra granularity of spend, helping them better forecast and manage budgets.

Discussion on Budgetary Issues and Office Politics

Cost allocation can really mess with how budgets are handled. Surprise expenses that pop up in reports, mainly when it involves shared costs, will have the departments freaking out. That is why it’s very important to establish some clear and objective rules as to how these shared costs would be allocated. Whether you do a direct usage split or an even split, setting expectations from the beginning will help avoid confusion and complaints.

It is office politics that can really make things very complicated. Teams could be resistant to a new model if they perceive that it would make them look unproductive or could be a reason for cuts in the budget. Just having some chats explaining why this new model is coming and how it’s to everybody’s benefit can make all the difference. Make the leadership part of it, getting their buy-in and having them put across to the teams why this change really matters. Helping Teams Adjust

Helping teams change their approach

This is often a key part of rolling out a new cost strategy. Training in the reading of cost data and how to use such data will make quite a big difference. They need to learn how to track their spending, what to do when they are near the limits, and how to use cost data to plan. This awareness takes time to build. On many occasions, starting with a showback model is very helpful before going to full chargeback. It’s one way of allowing teams to see what usage and costs are, without immediately impacting their budgets. With time, they’ll be better prepared to take on that direct cost responsibility. I have seen many customers who dive straight into implementing chargeback, no matter how transparent the data provided is, fail in successfully maintaining their cost allocation strategy.

Fine-Tuning Your Cost Allocation Strategy

With the basics set up and all of your teams settled in, it might be the time to think about how to make your cost allocation even better. Following are a few strategies to consider as you refine your approach:

1. Getting the Most from Reserved Instances and Savings Plans

If your company is on Reserved Instances or Savings Plans, it becomes a headache to share that cost among teams. Another way to do it would be sharing the savings according to usage. Like, for example, a few teams using a Reserved Instance together would split up the cost according to how much each actually benefits from it. It feels fairer that way, and it further pushes teams to make use of the resource judiciously. Alternatively using AWS Billing Conductor to limit the sharing of Savings Plans or Reserved Instances outside of departmental or Team boundaries helps reduce friction.

2. Handling Spot Instances

Of course, Spot Instances can really save you money in cloud expenses, but they bring their own set of problems with regard to tracking them. Because Spot Instances are usually utilized in small burps or only as a temporary fix, they might not always show up as neat and clean on cost reports. Being able to keep track of the usage of Spot Instances and properly assign their costs to teams for those resources can surely help you see what you’re really spending.

3. Connection to Financial Systems

Having cost data within AWS is cool, but integrating it into your current financial systems takes it to the next level of detailed tracking. Quite simply, this may mean aligning your reports with your company’s finance tools so that data seamlessly flows out of AWS into where it’s actually needed. It can help with budget planning because it is much easier for finance teams to track cloud spending. I worked with one Public Sector customer wwhose finance team needed to first to download the CSV billing data from the AWS console. Next, they would fiddle around with adding cost codes to the data and match this up with the invoiced amount before they could actually journal it into their financial systems. Quite a resource-intensive job, really took a lot of time.

So, we just created a quick little QuickSight dashboard that was pulling from the CUR and a file that matched account IDs to cost codes. It actually did most of the tedious work and build a table. This then would let the finance team actually take that data that’s been processed and throw it into their financial system, just in order to save themselves a tremendous amount of time and reduce those darned human errors.

4. Automating Cost Tracking

Automation can really save time and make sure everything’s consistent. Using AWS APIs or scripts to whip up cost reports and alerts helps teams stay in the loop without having to pull data manually. Plus, this setup can ping you if spending goes over the limits you set, so teams get a heads-up before budgets start getting tight.

Monitoring, Reporting and Continual Improvement

Once a cost allocation strategy has been put into place, that is not the end of the work. Keeping it fresh involves periodically reviewing your approach and making changes as appropriate. This requires developing effective monitoring systems for your costs, creating reports for several stakeholders, and learning from cost trends.

Building Dashboards for Many Stakeholders

Not everyone needs the same level of detail when it comes to cloud spending. Engineers will probably want to check usage trends for specific projects, while the finance teams are going to be more interested in how costs stack up against overall budgets. Custom dashboards for different groups make it way easier for them to find what they’re looking for.

For example, an engineering-focused dashboard would show which projects are nearing their budget limits or where resources could be scaled down. A finance-team dashboard, on the other hand, will show monthly spend across departments and highlight variances from budgeted amounts, with cost drivers tracked. AWS Cost Explorer and QuickSight help to build these dashboards and customize them for your team’s needs.

Automating Cost Allocation Reports

The teams will find regular cost reports very helpful in keeping an eye on spending. Automating these reports means they just show up without anyone having to dig through the data each time. This helps teams quickly make decisions and spot trends as they come up. Use scheduled reports from tools like AWS Budgets, or export data from the Cost and Usage Report into Quicksight Dashboards like the Cost Intelligence Dashboard or CUDOS dashboards that are updated automatically.

Analyzing Trends and Variances

Keep an eye on cost reports regularly to notice patterns and catch any surprise spikes. Perhaps a certain project is using up more resources than planned, or a shared service costs more than anticipated. Staying on top of things, finding out why costs are changing, lets teams respond before those costs blow up into bigger budget problems.

Keeping Policies Up-to-Date

A cost allocation policy isn’t something you can just set and forget. As your company grows or its usage of the cloud changes, you really need to check back in and update how you’re splitting and tracking costs. Regular catch-ups with finance and department heads can help identify where you might need to make changes. In this way, everyone remains on the same page with expectation, and your cost strategy will remain effective as things change.

Conclusion: Shaping an Economical Tomorrow

It is pretty daunting to put together an AWS cost-allocation strategy, but after all, it pays dividends. By making the rules, actually deciding whether to charge back or show back, and by AWS tracking, your teams would be in better control of the cloud budgets. This not only keeps away the surprise bills that arrive but also makes everybody wiser for smarter decision-making on resource use.

Setting up your tags well and accounts gets the ball rolling, but from there, fancier features such as the AWS Cost Explorer, the Cost and Usage Reports, and even custom dashboards take in massive views. Add in actual conversations concerning shared costs, with frequent refreshes of policy, and your strategy scales out with your organization.

It’s the perfect time to think about how you are managing your cloud costs as this very moment. Maybe it is the first step, or perhaps you’re just adjusting something you may already have, but having a tangible cost allocation model undoubtedly strengthens the financial output of all your cloud projects.

Series Navigation

<< Building a FinOps Culture: Training and Education